When I first began buying rental houses and apartment buildings, I could easily find properties that offered net unleveraged rental yields* of 10 to 16 percent. In some areas of the country, such as the Midwest, you can still achieve such favorable results. More typically, today’s rental properties yield four to eight percent.
You might tell me that four to eight percent doesn’t seem like a great rate of return. But relative to stocks and bonds, properties win hands down. Let me explain why.
Why Rental Properties Outperform Stocks
At present, the annual dividend (income) yield on the S&P 500 stock index barely reaches 1.8 percent, and just .45 percent on NASDAQ stocks. The Dow-Jones (DJIA) is somewhat higher, at around 2.25 percent. If you follow the advice that says you must diversify across a broad variety of stocks, you might achieve a yearly income of $15,000 to $20,000 (1.5 to 2 percent average yield) from a stock portfolio valued at $1 million. In contrast, a million in property value would return a rental income (net of expenses) of $40,000 to $80,000 a year.
So the message is clear. If you accumulate a million dollars in stocks and are determined to survive above the poverty level in the future, you’ll need to eat your nest egg. But accumulate a million dollars in property and, to live an average-to-above-average lifestyle, you’ll never need to eat your nest egg. And your net worth doesn’t diminish.
Why Rental Properties Outperform Bonds
Currently, long-term investment grade bonds yield about 4.5 to 6.0 percent. Without taking on much default risk, that means you could count on receiving $50,000 to $60,000 a year from bonds for each $1 million you invest. Bonds deliver income returns that approach the level of income offered by high-quality rental properties. Also, compared with a fully diversified portfolio of stocks, bonds clearly rank superior, but here’s the rub:
Your bond income will not increase as the result of inflation or economic growth and, as consumer prices go up, the buying power of your bond income will continuously erode. In terms of purchasing power, $60,000 of income today will equal $40,000 after just 10 years. In contrast, over time, both stock dividends and property rents tend to climb each year to higher levels.
So what’s the verdict? Stock income increases over time, but the puny yield produces too little income. Bonds return a better yield than stocks, but fail to offer the possibility of growth. Worse, in an inflationary economy, the real value of bond income declines.
So if history is any indicator, it is clear that you will achieve an extremely competitive yield, growth, and protection against inflation with rental property.
* Rent collections, less all cash expenses and mortgage financing. You calculate this figure by dividing the price of the property into its net income; e.g., $10,000/$100,000 = 10 percent yield.
For more ways to leverage more income from your money, be sure to read the new book Trump University Wealth Building 101: Your First 90 Days on the Path to Prosperity. Available soon from Trump University and all major booksellers.
Real Estate Investing and The Global Economic Crisis
Please send me Trump University's weekly e-newsletter Inside Trump Tower and let me know about special offers.
See how you stack up against Donald Trump take our FREE entrepreneurship test.
Follow Us on Twitter
Become a Fan of Trump University's Facebook Page
Trump University on You Tube
How to Change the World
Tom Peters
Conversation Marketing
Freakonomics
Marketing Excellence Blog
Rajesh Shakya
Trump University Real Estate 101 Building Wealth with Real Estate Investments
Commercial Real Estate Investment 101 How Small Investors Can Get Started and Make It Big
6 Comments
Thank you for unleashing the insights of rental business. I am not in real Estate business, but it's attracting me day by day. Thank you for teachings in real estate.
Rajesh Shakya
http://www.rajeshshakya.com
Helping technopreneurs to excel and lead their life!
Home price appreciation (a.k.a. capital appreciation) on real estate for the same period is roughly 4.5% [www.ofheo.gov]. Combine this amount with the monthly rental income and you still don't come close to performance of owning stocks.
It's all about balancing risk and reward. The current market data doesn't support an investment in real estate versus a diversified portfolio of stocks.
The bottom line is that real estate takes more risk and doesn't reward you enough for that risk.
Susan
http://www.susanvlz.blogspot.com
This effects my company because there are not as many spec homes being built. We have had to lay some guys off. The investors are waiting for the prices to plunge again before they re-engage the market, this leaves many who legitimately need to purchase a home for a primary residence, in a bad situation. Not to mention the track home industry that was booming has all but come to a stand still.
I suppose these are the unintentional consequeces of people making their money.
Sabrina (real estate investor, musician, author, "an ideas person"!)
Many investor from europe and the uk are buying real estate in the united states.
I've interviewed a real estate agent in california a week ago and he was telling me how much the market was bad until he started to work with investors from europe and the uk.
"They just have a lot of money" he said.
"I met them during a spring brake in europe. I said to my self there is no work anyway so I will go and travel a little bit.
I think it's the best vacation I ever had and it's still continuing , the only difference is that now I'm actually making money".
Investors don't need any green card, good credit, bad credit or visa.
They only need to put a least 35% of the purchase price as a down payment.
These investors will get a higher interest rate and if they will put 50% as a down payment they will probably get a much lower interest rate.
Today the euro is much higher then the dollar.
So if the american investors are excited about the foreclosures can you imagine the europeans?
For the europeans everything is much cheaper than for americans, because the value of the euro as oppose to the dollar.
Can a foreigner really get a loan in america?
Sure they can get a loan, just like an american investor can get a hard money loan without showing any credit information, they just need to show interest. interest for a mortgage lender is measured with money. banks or hard money lenders will loan you the money but you will have to put as a down payment a big chunk of your money. Than you will not going to loose the property you've purchased and get the banks in trouble.
Also there are many banks out there that are selling their Loans or notes to foreigners just because they need to take some loans off of their shelves, just the way you're trying to avoid foreclosure or trying just to sell the house.
Banks today have to deal with so many issues like foreclosures, bankruptcies, notes and money in general.
Most banks that have loaned money to borrowers in the past 3 years are not protected or insured.
Three years ago the bank started to loan 1st and 2nd mortgages, 2nd mortgages are the cause of them not having mortgage insurance. So because they don't have mortgage insurance they will loose their money if a foreclosure is placed.
So why did the banks offered borrowers 2nd mortgages?
Because it was easy to qualify and a lot of borrowers tried to avoid refinancing their 1st mortgage.
Banks just wanted to make money and more money and that's what they did.
Now the banks are not willing to Loan 2nd mortgages anymore.
Read other articles I wrote to learn more about mortgage insurance.
http;//hardmoneyloans.org