The following question was submitted to "Ask Donald Trump" by Ray C.
Q: Do you think because of employers seeing how you handle things on The Apprentice it has become easier for individuals in business who watch to say “You’re Fired!” to under performing employees?
A: I don’t think anyone really likes to fire another person. I know I don’t. I’d rather keep people around, but sometimes it’s necessary. I’ve had employees who have been with me for decades, and that’s my preference. I think employers understand the premise of the show and what is going on, and as professionals, it wouldn’t alter their course of action.
Related Posts
The Think Big Approach
Donald Trump Will Now Take Your Questions
Please send me Trump University's weekly e-newsletter Inside Trump Tower and let me know about special offers.
See how you stack up against Donald Trump take our FREE entrepreneurship test.
Follow Us on Twitter
Become a Fan of Trump University's Facebook Page
Trump University on You Tube
How to Change the World
Tom Peters
Conversation Marketing
Freakonomics
Marketing Excellence Blog
Rajesh Shakya
Trump University Real Estate 101 Building Wealth with Real Estate Investments
Commercial Real Estate Investment 101 How Small Investors Can Get Started and Make It Big
11 Comments
Terry Long
P.S. I still need to see this years season. I will watch them on Hulu.
Unfortunately, I'm not so sure that there are not people (like that wing commander) who take Mr Trump's famous words on the show far too literal and do not understand the compassionate side of Mr Trump. I too have had to fire people and it is always unpleasant for all concerned. But it is a great show.
http://jessicabond.blogspot.com
Unfortunantely sometimes it has to be done. It's up to the one in charge.
And as you say, I think people understand it's just a show. I think the last thing you want is people to think it's cool and start saying "you're fired!" to their employees because it is a cool "gimmick". But who knows, maybe there is some schmucks who does, but they would be stupid anyways. Your show is good.
With wise management, a company usually goes through a number of steps before letting anyone go, and it should be well documented if it is a performance or attitude problem. Sometimes, though, a person is let go through no fault of his or her own, simply because of changes in business or the economy. I think those are the hardest ones because you realize the financial impact it may have.
I think everyone can benefit from analysis following letting someone go. It is important to examine what could be done to improve recruitment and retention, and what employee development might be added to improve overall performance. Then, if you are the person who was let go, it is equally important to examine what went wrong and find the lesson in the experience. Was it a mismatch? Was it personality conflicts? Usually, in the long run, when it gets to the point where you need to let someone go, it is in the best interest of all parties.
People are one of your organizations greatest assets. Most of them are very loyal. That speaks highly of how you handle personnel issues in the real world.
Sometimes people think rich people can be jerks because they fire employees and they "explode" them but they won't understand how a business man thinks, until they own their own business.
http://healthmoneyandloveblog.com
If the employee was performing his/her job at a sub-standard level, then chances are, that particular job was not best suited to their skills.
Cutting them loose will often force them to seek a position that may be better suited to their needs and skill set.
The person dosen't seem to know the abc of Economics and he's heading a central bank.