Over the years I have dealt with many architectural critics, some of them bad, some good, some excellent. I do not rate excellence just on what they’ve said about me, but rather on their level of taste and expertise.
One of the best I’ve ever known is the late great Herbert Muschamp of The New York Times. His reviews were not only interesting, in the terms of the building, but also literarily superb.
Generally speaking I have done well with architectural critics. I have found though, somewhat sadly, the choice of the architect is usually more important than the building itself. Certain trophy architects, who happen to be hot at the time, no matter what the design, will get a great review.
One time I was sitting with a certain architectural critic and I showed him a building I was building and I told him it was done by Philip Birnbaum, a New York architect who made lots of builders money, and who actually designed good buildings but would always get bad reviews. The critic sat at lunch and absolutely excoriated the building, he thought it was terrible. Then I told him I was only joking, the building was actually done by Philip Johnson. Over the course of the next ten minutes he started to retract his previous hatred for the building and by the end of the lunch he thought it was a great piece of art.
I used Philip Johnson at Trump International Hotel & Tower, at 1 Central Park West. It got wonderful reviews--but the building is deserving of wonderful reviews. So, architectural reviews are like menus in restaurants--everyone has their own taste and can choose accordingly.
One of the worst architectural critics I’ve encountered is Blair Kamin who writes for the Chicago Tribune. Not only is his writing at a low level, but his level of taste is even worse. He’s got, as an example, a pet building that he talks about glowingly which is absolutely terrible--a total joke. He has given me some good reviews and he has given me some negative reviews but he is a terrible architectural critic. The good news is that he probably won’t be at the Tribune much longer.
The real question is--do people value the opinions of critics? I say they probably do but in the end a great building will always be a great building.
Related Post
Top Ten Tips For Success
Related Training:
Learn real estate investing
Work With a Coach
Join Trump University's Network
Please send me Trump University's weekly e-newsletter Inside Trump Tower and let me know about special offers.
See how you stack up against Donald Trump take our FREE entrepreneurship test.
Follow Us on Twitter
Become a Fan of Trump University's Facebook Page
Trump University on You Tube
How to Change the World
Tom Peters
Conversation Marketing
Freakonomics
Marketing Excellence Blog
Rajesh Shakya
Trump University Real Estate 101 Building Wealth with Real Estate Investments
Commercial Real Estate Investment 101 How Small Investors Can Get Started and Make It Big
13 Comments
There are very few who can estimate good from bad themselves.
People listen to authorities to tell them which is which.
To me excellence and honesty are the authorities, that is why i prefer to listen to DT.
The builder and the financing are over the architect, and the building is over the critics.
Sincerely,
George Vedel
Nedre Mosevej 61
9990 Skagen
Denmark
Brendan Ryan
The Brendan Ryan Company
Houston, Texas
Sad to say there are people who will subordinate their tastes and thinking to so-called experts. Whether a critic is bad, good or excellent, an energetic person should see and or taste for his or her self while learning what they can from the "expert." Safe to say that whatever is branded with the Trump name is excellent.
Sincerely your friend and "Revolutionary Entrepreneur"
Nimrod
Dr. Nimrod Erech M. Christ Nimrod,
President, Co-founder
Self-Esteem & World Peace Association
Nimrodworldpeace@aol.com.
Mr. Trump, in the end, what really matters isn't what the critic writes, or what masses are easily lead to believe. What matters is that you know you did your best. It is much easier to critique than to produce, and most people are more inclined to see the flaws in other's work than in their own.
I realize, for marketing purposes, what is presented can have a financial impact, and most people are easily influenced. So, having a good rapport with those critics I'm sure is crucial. In the end, though, they do exactly what their title implies, they are critics - not praisers, and you go on doing what you were born to do. You build, and you build it to last.
It stands to reason that the name of the architect has impact. We are judged by those whose company we keep. As I'm sure their affiliation with you also impacts them. So, since you are being a critic of critics, in your estimation, what makes a good critic and what makes a good architect?
I visited that website http://www.trumpintl.com/ and I almost hold my breath and sighed: what a wonderful views! It is already pleasure to visit these websites, they give you harmony and takes you to another, beautiful world: http://www.trumpintl.com/Accommodations/packages.asp#romance.
I think all people must have rightness to his or her opinion and it is very good to have all kind of critics. If all the people only say good things about what you have done, so you can not learn to do your work more better or use better experts.
Many times it is so that critics do not have the courage to say really what they think. It is pitty. If the building is terrible but has a famous designer, it can get anyway good critiques. In the other hand if the building is beautiful but the designer is unfamous, the building can get bad critic.
Congratulations on Ivanka's soon to be marriage. I just got the news from Regis. Ivanka is a smart woman. No doubt her choice is right on the money. But I will think about the great fantastic Ivanka who got away :) smile.
Ivanka, best wishes. May your marriage last forever and a day and 33 minutes. You looked very beautiful talking with Regis and Kelly today. Your mind was sharp. Your dress, hair and shoes were lovely. Your eyes and smile were captivating. You are in great shape. Ivanka you would look good extremely fat, bald and wearing a big flour sack, because you are beautiful on the inside as well, which is very unique. Ivanka, you said that your fiancée is a catch. But you dear lady are a "CATCH!" God is with you both.
"A virtuous wife is a crown to her husband…" (Proverbs 12:4)
"Whoso findeth a wife findeth a good thing, and obtaineth favor from the LORD." (Proverbs 18:22).
Don’t be too hard on Regis if he misses any of his flights and does not make it to the wedding. Regis has the best of intentions and is a really, really good guy as we all know.
Sincerely, your friend and "Revolutionary Entrepreneur"
Nimrod
Dr. Nimrod Erech M. Christ Nimrod,
President, Co-founder
Self-Esteem & World Peace Association
Nimrodworldpeace@aol.com.
I embrace the idea that we shouldn’t pay attention to the critics but likewise, we shouldn’t ignore it. And as Mark Twain said: "One mustn't criticize other people on grounds where he can't stand perpendicular himself" http://www.bestwisewords.com/author/quotes/3/mark-twain-quotes
Regards,
Adina
http://www.bestwisewords.com/quotes/409/criticism-quotes
KeyS - What most people don't realize is that when they criticize, it says more about what they are than it does about the object of focus, just as how you react to the criticism says more about you than their words.
Architecture is a form of art. Like painting, sculpture, fashion design and many others, interests and tastes vary. One person may like the shape but not the colors used. Another person can be fascinated by a particular era or style. Victorean homes were considered ornate homes of the rich. Some people have referred to them as "gingerbread houses." I consider them charming, elegant and well-made.
In some places, architecture is limited by strict building codes. The height of the building, number of floors and the materials used both for construction and adornment must be approved before any building can be completed. This may seem unfair to some new architects, but usually they are not considering the overall look and feel of the place where they want to create something new, and the feelings of the people who also own property in that particular location. This can create a problem especially in a highly populated area such as New York City or a diverse, but much smaller location such as Long Island.
Critics need to be respected if they want to have followers who will take their advice. So selecting a well respected architect to talk about makes sense. Comparing the shabby work of an architect also makes sense. How else will people know the difference?
p.s. I want to become an American.Living and working in America are my dream.
John,
http://www.canadabanks.net/Banking_Terms.aspx